Today’s guest post is from M. David Huston.
In his May 26 remarks at the National Press Club, David A. Bednar stated that faithful members of the LDS church live the “commandment of tithing, as described in the Old Testament.”[1] Similarly, the LDS church’s essay on tithing, notes that “the Bible indicates that God’s people followed the law of tithing anciently.”[2] These statements, and others like them, seems to suggest that there is a single description of how tithing worked in the Old Testament. But the Old Testament’s language about tithing just isn’t that clear-cut. In the first five books of the Old Testament we find the foundational texts that are the backbone of how tithing was and is implemented. So, what do these texts say about tithing?
Genesis: Genisis includes only two brief references to tithing. Following Abraham’s victory over an alliance of regional kings, we learn that Abraham gave Melchizedek “tithes of all” (Genesis 14:20). The text does not state what was included in the “all” that Abraham gave Melchizedek,[3] nor does the Genesis have any additional insight into Abraham’s subsequent tithing practices. Additionally, after Jacob’s theophany at Bethel, Jacob vows that “of all that thou [the LORD] shalt give me I will surely give the tenth unto thee” (Genesis 28:22). We are never informed how exactly Jacob keeps this commitment.
Exodus: There is no reference to tithing (see the reference to the Sabbatical Year, discussed below).
Leviticus: Leviticus says that Israelites should tithe the “seed” and “fruit” of the land (but does not specify what that means exactly; likely it referred to grain, grapes, and olives) and their flocks. Interestingly, when it comes to animals that are part of the tithe, Israelites are expressly told not to try to determine the quality of animal given but to simply give “whatsoever passeth under the rod” (Leviticus 27:30-33). Though it is not expressly stated, in Leviticus tithes appear to have been given to the Levites.[4] This is likely part of the way the Levites (who had no land inheritance) subsisted.
Numbers: Numbers expressly states that tithing goes to the Levites for their consumption. Further, in Numbers, the Levites themselves were to offer a “tenth part of the tithe” of the grain and wine they received as a heave offeringto Aaron. Though the Levites’ heave offering was not a tithe per se, the fact of it being a “tenth part” and its textual proximity to tithe requirements suggests it could be viewed that way. This text also implies that, contrary to Leviticus, the Levites only received, and the Israelites only offered, tithes of grain and wine since there are no other items mentioned as being included in the heave offering (Numbers 18:21, 24, 26-31).
Deuteronomy: Deuteronomy’s yearly tithe appears to be limited to grain, wine, and oil (Deuteronomy 12:17; Deuteronomy 14:23). Yet, contrary to Leviticus and Numbers, the tithe is to be consumed by the person giving the tithe (alongside the firstlings of their flocks). The tithe/firstling feast is to be eaten “before the Lord thy God, in the place which he shall chose to place his name there” (i.e. at or near the Sanctuary) as a reminder of God’s blessings (Deuteronomy 14:23). Or, if it carrying the tithe to the designated feasting location is too difficult, then the person is authorized to sell the tithe, and take the money to the feast location to purchase oxen, sheep, wine, or strong drink, or “whatsoever thy soul desireth” and “eat there before the Lord thy God, and thou shalt rejoice, thou, and thine household” (Deuteronomy 14:24-26, see also Deuteronomy 26:12-13). Further, in Deuteronomy, every third year Israelites pay a “tithe of thine increase.” This tithe is also used for feasting, but that feast does not occur at the Sanctuary. Instead, it occurs “within they gates” (i.e. within one’s town/community) and includes Levites, strangers, orphans, and widows (Deuteronomy 14:27-29).
Sabbatical Year: Since planting was prohibited during the Sabbatical Year, every seven years there would be no tithe on agricultural goods (Exodus 23:10–11; Leviticus 25:1–7; Leviticus 26:33-35).
That is basically all that we find in the Torah. So, if we’re looking just at the foundational texts, this is what we have to work with:
- For Genesis we have a fairly expansive vision that suggests a tithe on “all” but no subsequent description of how that actually looked in the lives of Abraham or Jacob. Further, in Genesis we have no clear indication of how the tithe might have been used by the one who received it (and in Jacob’s case no indication of who received it at all).
- Deuteronomy and Numbers describe tithes include grain, wine, and oil; Leviticus adds cattle and sheep. However, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy make no mention of a tithe requirement for other aspects of a common Israelites’ production. For instance, there is no mention of work animals (e.g. donkeys) or birds (some of these were used for various rituals), nor is there any mention of the requirement to tithe things like wild fruit and nuts which were gathered in their season.
- In Numbers and Leviticus, the tithe is used as a means sustenance for the landless Levites. In Deuteronomy, the tithe is used for family and communal care.
- On the seventh year, no agricultural tithes were offered.
Thus, it is accurate to say (1) that tithing is presented as existing in multiple forms and fashions going back to Abraham (there is no scriptural basis for determining whether or not tithing existed previous to Abraham), and (2) that our scriptural texts present what tithing is and how it should be used in a multivalent way.
In later biblical accounts we see a variety of ways in which these basic principles are implemented and there has been more than two millennia of Rabbinical and Christian reflection on the practice of tithing (an exhaustive analysis of each is beyond the scope of this essay). The LDS church also seeks to incorporate these principles in its approach to tithing. So why does this matter? Because it means that the way in which tithing is instituted by the faithful is a matter of interpretation, not strict adherence to a clearly articulated Old Testament guideline—indeed, the LDS church’s approach to tithing has changed over time.[5] There is nothing wrong with this; in fact, it is generally the case that basic principles are prophetically interpreted for a given time and location.
But this also means that the LDS church’s current interpretation of these basic texts could change again as time and situations change. These foundational biblical texts allow for the potential consideration of many different approaches to tithing, consistent with prophetic guidance. To be clear, my goal in all of this is not to suggest a free-for-all when it comes to tithes. However, there are different ways LDS church could approach tithing all of which have as much grounding in the Old Testament texts as our current approach does. For instance:
- Families could dedicate their tithe (all or some portion of it) for family celebration/gathering at the temple. This would be consistent with the tithe described in Deuteronomy.
- Only certain portions of production could require a tithe (e.g. only a part of one’s income, such as income earned beyond immediate family needs, or only interest gained). This would be consistent with the ideas underlying Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy which all had some bounding on what needed to be tithed.
- Some donations to community causes could ‘count’ toward tithing. This would be consistent with the third-year tithe described in Deuteronomy which saw this tithe as a part of communal care.
- Since the LDS church recognizes that service has a cash value (as is evidenced by its contract with the State of Utah[6]), members’ church or community service could constitute a portion of tithes as an in-kind donation. This would be consistent with Leviticus’s principled disinterest in whether it was “this” or “that” animal.
- Every seventh year, the LDS church could institute a Sabbatical Year, where the focus was on allowing “the land” to “rest.” In practice, this could mean a dedicated effort to contribute to environmental or social concerns in lieu of cash payments to the church.
Maybe, when it comes to tithing policy, we as a church have more flexibility than we might realize as we think about how we render unto God what is God’s (Mark 12:17; Matthew 22:21). What do you think?
Discuss.
[1] “An Apostle Describes a Latter-day Work,” Newsroom, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, May 26, 2022. Available at: https://newsroom.churchofjesuschrist.org/article/elder-bednar-national-press-club-speech
[2] “Tithing,” Gospel Topics, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Accessed 11/27/2022. https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/study/manual/gospel-topics/tithing?lang=eng
[3] It’s worth noting that Abraham’s tithes potentially included the spoils of war. In later Biblical text, war spoils were either kept or designated as herem, (set apart for destruction).
[4] I realize that while all Priests were Levites, not all Levites were Priests. For this discussion it is not important to distinguish between the two, and thus I will use the more general “Levites” to for ease of reference.
[5] See “A Brief History of Tithing” for a good summary of how LDS tithing policy has changed: https://www.ldsscriptureteachings.org/2016/12/22/a-brief-history-of-tithing/
[6] Eli Hager. “How has Utah saved $75 million on welfare? By providing next to none and taking credit for LDS welfare instead.” December 2, 2021. Salt Lake Tribune. Available at: https://www.sltrib.com/news/2021/12/02/utah-makes-welfare-so/
Thank you, David, for a fascinating read. It does highlight the struggle we have when it comes to proof-texting the scriptures for our modern-day church practice. We are the worst when it involves the OT. Statements like the one from Bednar do make it sound like we are simply doing what was done in the OT, when in fact the picture is far more complex and context-bound, especially when we are talking about Bronze and Iron Age societies! We are on safer ground if we say something like “The concept of tithing or giving something back to the Lord is ancient. Guided by modern-day revelation we practise it in this way.” Maybe I’m being too harsh on Bednar. Whatever 🙂
I loved your suggestions as to how we could be more creative with our interpretation of tithing. We should definitely put that money toward feasting at the temple. With the church’s war on temple cafeteria and its seeming desire to take away all the small pleasures from every church experience, this is the only way to go. And if you are sceptical of the cultural importance of the temple cafeteria, on my mission I spoke to a man waiting at a bus stop in Logan:
“Where are you off to?”
“The temple. It’s fish day. I always go to the temple on fish day.”
I rest my case.
Fascinating, thank you for these insights! And for parents who are paying for a wedding one year, that celebration at the temple might constitute the tithe, huh?
Our bishop is making an effort to get us in his office to declare our tithing. I know it’s to reconcile how we paid “Zero” and still be full tithe payers.
I’ve been avoiding it because I’m not in the mood to go in and argue why my “non-declared” donations to girls camp was all we had left to be charitable with after paying thousands for emergency medical care received at the beginning of the year.
I’m really unnerved by the church’s effort to chase me down to ask “where’s my money?!”
I notice that the Church follows OT tithing (more or less) but not the the OT (and NT) biblical day of rest (Sabbath). Not quite sure what to think unless the adage “follow the money” is still true.
OP: “Maybe, when it comes to tithing policy, we as a church have more flexibility than we might realize as we think about how we render unto God what is God’s”
As members we have the flexibility to declare what we deem to be a full tithe. However, bishop roulette has the final say when he submits his annual tithing report to SLC and whether he grants you a temple recommend.
My bishop is a great guy. He knows I pay tithing to various charities that actually need and put the money to use, and that I cannot in good conscience give the money to a church that simply adds it to an existing 100 billion “rainy day fund”. I told him I was fine with whatever decision he made regarding my tithing status, but either way, I was going to continue to do what is right, let the consequence follow.
I don’t have a recommend 🙂
@Call me Mark:
Same here. And it’s fine by me.
To the OP: It’s amazing that it took me 30-40 years in the church to actually read what the scriptures say and not what the church thinks they say. It’s truly enlightening. Thank you for the post.
I’d never put together all the different rules governing tithing throughout the scriptures. That was really interesting, thank you.
I might be wrong, but I don’t think any of the Brethren have talked about tithing since news of the Rainy Day Fund broke. I hope when they start to address tithing again, they’re willing to be more flexible on the rules. They’ve never said pay on the gross or the net – that’s up to the individual. I would support more flexibility, like paying on your increase rather than on your income.
When I quit paying tithing, I got a great job with good benefits and good retirement. Quitting tithing didn’t affect my financial situation at all, other than giving me another 10% to spend or save!
If you look at the Church’s interpretation of tithing you notice that we’ve evolved to 10% of income. But it wasn’t always that way. The thing is, the “10% of income” (gross) is the most generous version and the most lucrative for the institution. So I don’t really expect it to change…not if it cost the COJCOLDS money.
It’s a great time to discuss tithing. End of year, Christmas giving, and income tax time. But justifying it on OT scriptures doesn’t work for me. But I like the idea, just not the Church’s application.
Given the leadership no longer needs the money, it’s immoral to ask members living in poverty to tithe before they feed their families. It’s also probably illegal in some areas.
I’m not a fan of McTemples. Given the leadership’s emphasis on home churching, and reducing the number and duration of meetings, our chapel (church) designs are seriously outdated. Too much money is being spent on structures. As for the BYU’s, the leadership is turning them into Bob Jones’ West. (Not a good thing.)
I love the idea of tithing. But our money goes to humanitarian causes.
I went to Tithing Declaration this year to educate my new bishop on Ensign Peak Advisors and to share my list of alternate charities that have received my tithe
https://kutv.com/news/local/new-historical-information-reveals-original-meaning-of-lds-tithing
Here is an interesting note on the history of LDS tithing calculation.
“Bishop Partridge understood ‘one tenth of all their interest’ annually to mean 10 percent of what Saints would earn in interest if they invested their net worth for a year,” Harper wrote. He cited an example from Partridge who was reportedly in the room when Smith received the revelation.
Baha’is pay huquq’u’llah of 19 percent of their wealth (not income), with deductions, on a one-time basis (but paying annually as new wealth is accrued). Plus donations.
Ismailis pay dasond of 10 percent + 2.5 percent zakat = 12.5 percent of their gross income (after taxes). Plus donations.
SubGenii pay 44.99 in a limited-time TWO FOR ONE offer. Salvation guaranteed or triple your money back:
https://www.subgenius.com/scatalog/membership.htm
(See? It pays to shop around.)