We all know what celebrity endorsements are. You’re streaming a TV show or a football game and encounter a commercial or two where a celebrity endorses a car or a cologne or a hotel chain. Now some endorsements may have a certain degree of legitimacy, as when Michael Jordan endorses his brand of basketball shoes. He does, in fact, know a lot about playing basketball and how particular shoes help or hinder one’s performance, although it’s hardly an objective endorsement when he is endorsing his own branded shoe. But most celebrity endorsements are simply the company paying the celebrity to shower some of their fame and charm onto the endorsed product. They have no objective credibility. And most of us realize this when we reflect rationally on the whole set up.

But here’s the problem: celebrity endorsements apparently work. Here’s a quickie from Google AI: “Yes, celebrity endorsements are highly effective … They work because they grab attention in saturated markets, build consumer confidence, and make purchasing decisions faster and more secure.”

Here’s an example: In the 1990s, Subaru paid Paul Hogan, the actor who played Crocodile Dundee, to endorse their newish product the Subaru Outback. The ad campaign was wildly successful and here we are, thirty years later, with the Outback still going strong. But honestly, do you think Paul Hogan knows anything more about the mechanics or performance of an Outback than you or I?

I would be a more credible endorser than Hogan/Dundee, because I owned a Subaru Impreza Sport with a 5-speed manual transmission that got 180,000 miles, had almost no mechanical problems, and got pretty good gas mileage. On top of that, when a family member was driving it at highway speed and a deer jumped out in front of the car, the front-end crumple design absorbed all the shock and said family member suffered no injury whatsoever. Amazing, really, as that sort of incident can be much more serious (my sympathy if that happened to you and there was a bad outcome). So I can very credibly say, “Subaru, great cars, you won’t be sorry you bought one.” But Subaru didn’t pay me for an endorsement, they paid Crocodile Dundee, who may or may not have actually owned and driven one. And it worked marvelously well for Subaru.

What about religious endorsements? And I’ll talk about LDS religious endorsements, but I’m guessing a similar story can be told for other denominations. You don’t see them on commercials like the average celebrity endorsement, but the same dynamic is in play. One variation is when a famous actor/actress or sports star or musician is known to be LDS and that fact, with maybe a story or two, gets circulated.

A generation ago, there was Peter Vidmar, a gold medal gymnast who is LDS. The story was told of his coach insisting he practice seven days a week, but Vidmar nevertheless took Sundays off. (I guess it worked.) My quick check on Wikipedia reports that in 2015 he was called as a mission president in Australia. And there was Donny and Marie, Steve Young, and a few dozen others you can think of if you try.

Let me add that I’m not throwing shade on any of these LDS celebrities/stars. They are all pretty low-key about it. They are generally good examples despite being in the public eye (not an easy task) and generate good PR for the Church, which indirectly benefits you and me, so there’s that. And I’m sure there are times where being LDS creates real complications for a celebrity/star. Then there is the blowback they likely get from time to time from judgmental Mormons because they have to play on Sundays or perform in a production or role that isn’t G-rated. So they deserve some LDS respect, maybe more than they are generally given. But from the viewpoint of the average LDS member in the pews, there is definitely a “halo effect” from knowing about celebrities and stars who are also good LDS members.

A second variation is what I will call religious celebrities. I’m thinking of General Authorities, with a few LDS religion profs who hit the lecture circuit or write a popular book thrown in as well. GAs get a lot of screen time at Conference and streamed firesides, so we get to know them (their face and voice) pretty well. Their testimonies/endorsements of the Church are of course part of almost every talk. Do they have an effect? Well, yes. Whether realizing it or not, I suspect a lot of average Mormons lean on GA stories and testimonies (religious celebrity endorsements).

If we take a step back, we might ask (as we might ask of celebrity endorsements for cars or cologne): How objectively valid are LDS religious celebrity endorsements? That’s a serious question and can go either way. On the one hand, they do have a lot of religious experience, both in visiting congregations around the world and in reading/praying/speaking about religious topics. And they usually have their own deeply personal spiritual events to draw on. On the other hand, they are pushing their own product (like Michael Jordan pushing his own shoe brand) and they probably tailor and exaggerate their stories from time to time. If they have non-faith-promoting or even faith-damaging experiences, those don’t get shared. While they have broad life and career experience, they have little or no training for the ministry.

So this is really a wide-open question. Have some fun with it.

  • Name your favorite LDS celebrity.
  • Is there a story you heard about an LDS celebrity that encouraged you?
  • Name your favorite LDS religious celebrity.
  • Is there a talk you heard or a book you read by your LDS religious celebrity that encouraged you?
  • Any reverse effects, a book or story by an LDS religious celebrity that rubbed you the wrong way and pushed you away from testimony or activity?
  • Is LDS religious celebrity overplayed, underplayed, or just about right? Compare it say to the ostentatious religious attire the Pope wears in public appearances or to the hyped-up performances of Evangelical tele-preachers.