I recently finished reading Timothy Snyder’s book On Freedom (his follow up book to On Tyranny). He talked a lot about a concept that I’ve had a little difficulty wrapping my head around: the distinction between “freedom from” and “freedom to.” In his view, we often get the balance wrong and focus too much on making people free “from” bad things, and not enough on creating the freedom “to” create the lives we want to live.

I recently returned from a cruise after my mother’s death. It’s kind of a weird way to conclude a long weekend with family after a funeral, to jet off on a 10 day Caribbean cruise, but when you pay for last minute tickets in and out of Miami, it seems like a prudent way to make more value out of the cost of the trip. When it came up that we were there because of a funeral, one stranger (new friend?) said, “Oh, I’m sure your mother would love that you are out living your best life.” It was a nice sentiment, whether true or not (who’s to say?), but my reply was that one thing I have always said about my mother is that she lived the life she chose, and so do I. According to Timothy Snyder, that’s the type of freedom we should seek–the freedom “to.”

Before you can have the freedom “to,” though, you have to also have freedom “from.” If you are born into extreme poverty, you may never even reach adulthood, so all of your freedoms are limited. If you live under a violent regime, your life may be forfeit. You could be sent to fight in a war. You could be orphaned or raped. You don’t even come close to experiencing basic freedoms in these situations. Here’s a good starter list of things we have to be free “from” before we can be free “to”:

  • Fear – People need to be free from fear of violence, persecution, or threats from the state or other entities to live and express themselves freely.
  • Oppression – Freedom from authoritarian control, censorship, or systemic injustice is essential for autonomy.
  • Poverty – Economic insecurity can undermine individual freedom by limiting choices and access to opportunities.
  • Ignorance – Misinformation or lack of education can prevent people from making informed decisions, restricting their freedom.
  • Hate and Discrimination – To be free, individuals must be protected from prejudice and systemic barriers based on race, religion, gender, or other identities.
  • Exploitation – Workers and citizens need freedom from exploitation and unjust working conditions to preserve their dignity and independence.
  • Surveillance – Excessive monitoring and invasion of privacy can stifle personal freedom and self-expression.
  • War and Conflict – Individuals must be free from the chaos and destruction of war to exercise their rights and live in peace.

It’s an interesting list because even within each of these items, we are free to varying levels. For example, let’s say you are raised in a home where misinformation is shared and believed, and where you are only accepted if you agree. You may be ignorant of other perspectives. If you never get access to accurate or better information, this ignorance will curtail your freedom to create the life you want. Or consider surveillance. We are all surveilled to some extent by the groups in which we engage: employers, families, online interactions. The pressures from those who observe our actions can alter what choices we make as individuals in order to avoid social consequences for non-conformity.

So, what about the freedoms “to”? Here’s a starter list of what those entail:

  • Speak and Express Themselves – Freedom to voice opinions, share ideas, and participate in public discourse without fear of censorship or retribution.
  • Choose Leaders – The ability to vote in fair elections and participate in democratic governance.
  • Seek Knowledge – Freedom to access information, pursue education, and question authority to make informed decisions.
  • Move and Travel – The right to move within and between countries without unnecessary restrictions.
  • Pursue Opportunity – Freedom to work, create, and seek economic or personal advancement.
  • Practice Religion or Beliefs – The ability to follow one’s faith or secular principles without interference.
  • Associate with Others – Freedom to form communities, unions, or organizations based on shared interests or goals.
  • Create and Innovate – The freedom to express creativity, invent, and contribute to cultural or scientific progress.
  • Live Authentically – The right to make personal choices about identity, relationships, and lifestyle without societal or legal constraints.
  • Protest and Resist – Freedom to challenge injustices, question authority, and demand accountability from those in power.

This list feels much more like the experience of freedom. When I was reading this book, the BYU crackdown on professors (which feels like an evergreen topic at BYU) that has been burgeoning under Clark Gilbert’s draconian leadership was being reported in the Tribune and discussed by the world’s worst humans on Twitter [1]. The environment at BYU isn’t really the topic for this post, but it is an example of how one can be free in some sense, but not truly feel free when there is no freedom to be authentic or to behave in ways that are not controlled by the state (in this case, BYU). Professors described feeling that they couldn’t pursue academics freely and couldn’t express their true opinions, albeit with a faith-promoting spin, because everything was being scrutinized and surveilled with dire consequences to employment. That’s not freedom, according to Tim Snyder’s book.

  • Do you feel that you are both free from and free to, according to these lists?
  • Are you more free in the church or outside of it?
  • What types of freedom do you feel you lack?
  • How do you strike the right balance between these types of freedoms?

Discuss.

[1] The defenders of the faith who swarm any thread about the Church on X to make sure that everyone knows that everything is just hunky-dory, and that if you don’t agree you should GTFO.