How many of our readers who served a mission continue to have “mission dreams” in which you are back on your mission, but then you realize that it’s not right because back home you have a family and you’re married? Or, for those who no longer attend church, do you sometimes dream that you are in the temple or in a church service? Similarly, have you dreamt that you were back in school, but you couldn’t find your locker or your class schedule, or you suddenly realized that you forgot to attend classes for an entire semester and today was the big test? In the waking world, how often have you had a fight with your spouse or a parent and replayed that exchange over and over in your mind, reliving the argument, thinking of better comebacks or the thing they said that really wounded you? Have you heard church members say “People can leave the church, but they can’t leave it alone.” These may all be examples of something called the Zeigarnik effect.

In 1927, Lithuanian-Soviet psychologist Bluma Zeigarnik was inspired by her mentor Kurt Lewin who noticed that the most skilled waiters could remember the details and specifics of orders customers gave them verbally with complete accuracy, but they quickly forgot the orders once they handed them off to kitchen staff. Their task was to deliver the accurate order to the kitchen. If they mentally took reponsibility to also ensure the order was completed with accuracy, they would then forget the orders after the bill was paid and the customers left the restaurant.

Zeigarnik created an experiment based on this observation to see what would happen if participants were given specific, detailed tasks, but interrupted before the tasks were completed. Would they forget the details or recall them even more vividly? What she found was that those who were prevented from completing the tasks had much more accurate and longer recollection of the tasks than the uninterrupted participants had. The tension caused by this “unfinished business” gave the tasks a staying power that completing the task erased. This is in part due to the mental “to-do” list that we all carry around with us (emotional labor in feminist terms); if an item is not finished, we have to hold onto it mentally until it is. There is mental tension, like a cliffhanger in a TV series, that holds our attention to the details before there is a resolution. (This effect is in fact deliberately used by show-runners for this very reason).

So, how does this apply to religion? Religious experiences are often emotionally fraught, tied up in personal identity, childhood perspectives, family dynamics, and purpose-driven behavior. Here are some ways in which this can manifest:

Unresolved beliefs. People in religions, particularly ones with fundamentalist views, often hold contradictory beliefs. These paradoxes create cognitive dissonance loops that can never be fully resolved; the theology itself forbids closure. These ideas create chronic low-level rumination, feelings of shame, guilt, anxiety, or obsessive theological analysis. For example:

  • “You are a child of God” and “You are unworthy of God’s love and the approval of good people unless you do X,Y, and Z”
  • “You have agency” vs. “Disobedience leads to eternal loss”
  • “The human condition involves suffering” and “You can prevent suffering through your obedience.”

Interrupted Identity Development. One’s sense of identity includes their place in the community they belong to. Leaving one’s religion throws that identity into question. Your sense of self, belonging, your social worth, and your core narrative are all interrupted and have not yet been replaced. The Zeigarnik effect forces your mind to revisit the “unfinished story,” to make sense of the loss of self and place. This is of course not solely something that happens in religion. It’s also very much what happens when a marriage ends and to a lesser extent when you move to a completely new location where you don’t know anyone.

Unfinished God Business. When you leave a faith, your relationship with that religion is ruptured by disillusionment and often social rejection. Some of that rejection is from the community, but it’s far more traumatic the closer to home it hits. Additionally, you are renegotiating your relationship with God, your worldview, the rituals that brought meaning to you previously (whether you liked them or not), and religious authority (again, regardless of how you felt about them). Particularly with these larger non-personal relationships, you can’t simply “talk it out” or try to find a way forward in your relationship. You can’t expect to get a satisfying apology from people you don’t know, like religious leaders, and you also may never get one from people you do know. Additionally, while religions all have some kind of entry ritual (e.g. baptism), there is almost never an exit ritual, well, other than death.

Unresolved Moral Conditioning. In high-control religions (ones with rules for conduct like the Word of Wisdom, Law of Chastity, church attendance, profanity), obedience and purity (or “worthiness”) are deeply moralized, tied to cosmic justice. When someone leaves such a system, they may feel that their moral compass is broken. I once had a conversation with an LDS colleague who said that his brother-in-law left the church and became an atheist and then cheated on his wife. The way he said it implied that all atheists behave immorally, and I objected strenuously. I said, “Sounds like your brother-in-law was an asshole, but I don’t see how that was caused by his atheism.” If we are accustomed to an external moral compass (the church or its leaders), then when that is removed, it’s confusing. How do you know if you are a good person without those external markers of success?

When I was in college on the other side of the country, my parents moved from the state I grew up in, the place where all my school and church friends were. This was before email was even a thing, believe it or not, much less social media, and long distance phone calls were expensive. I felt completely cut off from the place my mind considered to be my home, although it was true that I no longer had even one family member there. This unresolved tension manifested in a recurring dream I had in which I was in a city about thirty miles from my hometown, but I only had a bicycle to get there, and I couldn’t remember which roads to take. Night was falling. I cycled and cycled, but I never reached my home before I woke up, yearning for a place that was no longer accessible. I had this dream frequently when I was in my twenties and thirties, but then I went back for a visit. I saw my friends, I walked down the lanes and railroad tracks, by the river, drove through my high school and elementary school parking lots, and even toured through my old house thanks to a really nice home-owner who had bought it from my parents and still remembered them. The dreams stopped. I have been able to keep myself connected to what I consider my home in meaningful ways since that time, and the dreams haven’t returned.

Certain religious environments accidentally reinforce Zeigarnik loops:

  • Perfectionism theology – “Be ye therefore perfect.”
  • Conditional belonging – “If you are worthy…”
  • Guilt-based control systems – constant self-audit for sin.
  • Ambiguous doctrines – salvation as never quite secure.

When the “task” of being good enough never ends, believers live in chronic cognitive and emotional tension — the same mechanism Zeigarnik found in unsolved puzzles. It would be more accurate in these cases to say “People can leave the church, but the church never leaves them alone,” and not in the way many ex-Mos mean it (e.g. the missionaries or ward members keep contacting you even when you say you aren’t interested).

This becomes even more complicated when you consider that those who were raised in the Church have also bonded with it as a pseudo-parent, an attachment system. Maybe I’ll talk about that in another post.

  • Have you experienced dreams related to unresolved trauma like college, mission service, the temple or the church? Would you share what you dreamed? Did those dreams resolve or do you still have them sometimes?
  • Have you experienced Zeigarnik effect? Did you eventually resolve it?
  • If you were to advise someone how to resolve religious trauma, what would you say?
  • If you created an “exit ritual” for the Church, what would it be?
  • Do you think Zeigarnik effect is just as common to those still in the church (e.g. mission dreams) as it is to those who have left?
  • Is it unjust to tell former church members that they can “leave the church but they can’t leave it alone” given how the mind works?

Discuss.