Here is a story at the Salt Lake Tribune: “LDS Church suffers setback in China as government shuts down congregations in Beijing and other cities.” Here are the first two sentences:

In recent months, several Chinese municipalities across the giant Asian nation have shut down congregations of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints without warning, citing a failure to register with the government.

The closed branches ranged from Nanjing in the eastern province of Jiangsu to Jilin Province in the north. The most recent “banning,” however, was aimed at the two branches in the capital of Beijing — one for expatriates and one for Chinese worshippers.

I attended the Beijing expat branch as a visitor a few years ago. The two branches (one for Chinese nationals, one for expats) are not simply separate units using the same location for meeting. The members of the two branches are prohibited from having any contact at all, and the branches worked very hard to abide by that restriction. So why were these branches shut down, or at least prohibited from holding their branch meetings as a unit? Here is the explanation offered by the relevant Civil Affairs Bureau in Beijing:

On June 22, the Civil Affairs Bureau of the Chaoyang District in Beijing announced that “the ‘Mormon Beijing Branch’ carried out activities in the name of social organizations without registration, which violated the provisions of the … ‘Regulations on the Administration of Social Organization Registration.’”

Now you and I both know that if there is one thing the Church knows how to do (when it wants to) it is filing proper paperwork. This official explanation is almost certainly a pretext, the same sort of misleading and implausible explanation for questionable or simply unlawful governmental actions that Trump officials now routinely offer.

The Trib story gives a better explanation, noting that “Latter-day Saint Chinese experts point out that this latest crackdown is not just aimed at branches, but is focused on many other nongovernmental organizations and faith groups with headquarters outside of the Asian nation.” So China isn’t just picking on the LDS Church, it is targeting lots of churches as well as other organizations.

An even broader explanation is the up and down, give and take rhythms that authoritarian regimes use to modulate domestic policy in line with foreign relations. When things are good with the West, China and Russia are more tolerant of organizations with ties outside of those countries to operate, albeit with a variety of restrictions and bureaucratic requirements. When there is tension, oversight and regulation gets tightened or foreign businesses and organizations are simply shut down, as is happening now in China.

Trump’s tariff war against China is certainly part of the story here of increased tension. Church units in Russia went through a similar arc over the last thirty or so years, initially allowed to operate, then stringently limited. I’m not as familiar with the details for Russia. Perhaps a reader can add some details in the comments. I know that not so long ago LDS missionaries from outside the country were permitted to proselyte in Russia and there were thousands of LDS members there.

What’s the moral of the story? Here’s what I think. The relentless support that LDS leaders and most of the LDS membership has given to Trump and, in earlier years, his radically conservative predecessors (remember Ezra Taft Benson?) has come home to roost. There are consequences for supporting stupid, reckless politicians and giving them power. Trump is so stupid that, even now, he does not understand that the direct burden of tariffs falls on businesses and consumers who pay for imported products, not the countries shipping those products. So it’s hard to have much sympathy for the Church getting kicked out of these countries given decades of unwavering LDS support for the politicians and policies that have undermined the more moderate working relationship that the US had cultivated around the world in prior years. If global tension is bad for LDS missionary work (and overseas stakes and activities), then LDS leaders and members shouldn’t support stupid, reckless candidates who incite global tensions.

What do you think? Does anyone have similar stories to share about restrictions on LDS activities in other countries? Counterexamples are welcome, of course.