What was sex ed like when you were growing up? This was a question in a Reddit forum called r/AskOldPeople, which despite the insulting title is a pretty fun forum to hear from Gen Xers like me and occasional Boomers. It reminded me of a post I started and never finished about 10 years ago. The topic of how kids are taught about sex in the school system is always a fraught one, even more now that Project 2025 wants to do weird stuff like burning books that mention anything other than married, straight sex, missionary position, lights out, curtains drawn, no noise, and only for purposes of procreation. Or something like that. I mean, maybe they want those books gone, too. Who knows? Does it even matter when the kids are binge-watching Euphoria?

Sex education in schools often varies by region, and is supposed to be delivered throughout one’s schooling with age-appropriate content. Some people conflate maturation education with sex education, or only had maturation education. Maturation education is something that usually occurs in 4th or 5th grade. Boys and girls each receive a separate lesson about the changes to their bodies as a result of puberty, things like hygiene, and personal care. Sex education is about sexual behaviors, how to avoid STDs and unwanted pregnancies, how human gestation works, and appropriate behaviors like consent-based interactions and sexual ethics.

Here’s a quick rundown of the sex education I personally received:

  • 3rd grade. Rural Texas. A wide-eyed classmate told me on the playground that she knew someone who went in a closet with a boy and he put his finger in her belly-button and nine days later she had a baby. I was skeptical of this claim, repeatedly putting my own finger in my belly-button to myth-bust her dubious claims. I did not have a baby nine days later.
  • 4th or 5th grade. New Jersey. The girls and boys were separated for “maturation” talks to learn about menstruation (girls) and wet dreams (boys). The girls got little period kits, but I don’t think the boys got masturbation kits. Funny that the girls learn about pain and inconvenience, but the boys learn about pleasure.
  • 9th grade. Pennsylvania. The boys’ coach said “You know, you girls get in the cars with your boyfriends, and you’re goin’ ‘Ooh, I luv you,’ and the next thing you know, BAM, there’s a little baby.” This was not super helpful information. Also most of us didn’t have driver’s licenses yet, so whose cars were these? I seriously doubted his credentials to be teaching health classes. Given our school’s record, his credentials to coach football were also pretty sus.
  • 10th grade. Still Pennsylvania. The girls’ field hockey coach (lesbian, natch–I swear they will save humanity) blew up a condom and put it on a banana. We watched a film that showed 3 different childbirths and one of my friends passed out and hit her head on the classroom radiator which was definitely the highlight of the class. There was a lot of talk about condoms to prevent STDs and some talk about AIDS prevention (this was mid-80s). Now THAT was sex ed. Of course, by that point at least two of my classmates were mothers, and a few others had already had abortions. I believe consent and ethics were also discussed, but in a 1980s way. Later in the semester she talked about suicide. She also did a thing on drugs that was very informative. Overall, not bad. Two thumbs up.

I’m pretty sure all schools do some kind of similar-ish maturation education, but sex education varies greatly. These are the most common approaches:

  • Comprehensive. The focus is on medically accurate information, anatomy, reproduction, puberty, contraception, STIs, sexual orientation, gender identity, healthy relationships, consent, and sexual decision-making. My 10th grade teacher was probably doing the mid-80s version of comprehensive sex ed.
  • Abstinence-only. The focus is on promoting abstinence from sexual activity until marriage. It often emphasizes the risks of sexual activity such as unintended pregnancy and STIs. I mean, maybe the 9th grade guy was attempting this, badly?
  • Parental Opt-Out or Opt-In. These are self-explanatory terms. I’m pretty sure parents could opt you out where I attended, but that it was assumed that if they didn’t proactively do so, you would attend the class. Even more conservative areas probably require a permission slip to attend. I can also state with 100% certainty that every kid in that school instantly knows which kids have weirdo, controlling parents who are not allowing them to attend because they want to keep their precious tiny babies pure and unspotted from the world. You do not want to be one of those kids. (I should add that post-MAGA my high school district has been taken over by insurrectionist Moms of Liberty types who have banned both Romeo & Juliet and To Kill a Mockingbird.)

The most effective approach for reducing teen pregnancies and STIs is Comprehensive Sex Ed. Since this is a Mormon-themed blog, I googled it to see what Utah does, and you may not be surprised to find out that Utah does not require Comprehensive sex education. They do what they call abstinence-based, and they require parents to opt in. They also do not teach: sexual orientation, gender identity, or consent. Instead of consent, they teach “refusal skills” [1] which places the onus on the recipient of the sexual advances rather than the aggressor. Color me surprised.

Just to be fair, I googled and discovered that Pennsylvania does not require sex education at all, leaving it up to the school districts. That could be why one year we got a laughably inept attempt, followed by a competent one the next year. Arizona (where two of my kids graduated high school) also does not require any sex education, but the thirty-year old law in place states that if districts decide to teach it, it must be abstinence-based and opt-in. So that’s yikes. New Jersey, which I’m sure most of our readers only know as the butt of Jersey Shore and mafia-related jokes [2], does require comprehensive sex ed, including sexual orientation, gender identity, and allowing parents to opt-out if they proactively request it. Schools that fail to teach comprehensive sex ed are subject to penalties. Go, Garden State!

So, by my reckoning, it looks like New Jersey is top of the heap, followed by . . . Utah. But I’m certainly not lauding what Utah is doing either.

I remember there being a lot of debate about this back in the 80s, and there were quite a few who felt that sex education is best taught by the parents in the home, which might be true, but also gross. I mean, learning about sex from your parents alerts you to the fact that they probably had sex at some point (although hopefully not any more!). But I suppose there is no boner killer like thinking about your parents’ sex lives. I’m not sure how well parents do at this in general. Here’s roughly how my own “in home” sex ed went:

  • Age 5. I asked my mom where babies ate from if they weren’t bottle-fed. She seemed really annoyed and angry at being cornered about this, and then she finally reached out, touched each of my nipples and said “from your BOOBIES!” in a voice that was very similar to the Wicked Witch of the West. I was horrified.
  • Age 11. My mom called me in to her room and handed me a very dry pamphlet about sex (which I already knew about, basically). It had internal organs diagrammed on it, and was pretty uninteresting. No character development. No plot. Fortunately, Three’s Company was available at the time, although it was also not that educational.
  • Age 13. My mom told me my sister’s husband kept waking her up in the middle of the night for S-E-X. Yes, she spelled it out. I was expected to agree with her that this was an outrage, although I questioned the appropriateness of me knowing this personal information. The main thing I learned is that sleep is definitely better than sex. Also that sex is way too disgusting and dirty to say the word.[3]

Lest you think I must have been some model of parenthood, I was definitely not great. I don’t recall ever specifically having anything that could be called “the talk” with my kids, mostly because I assumed that they would get something akin to comprehensive sex ed, like I had. Why are we sending them to school if I have to do the heavy lifting?? I do often joke with my daughter that her third parent was Olivia Benson from Law & Order: Special Victims Unit. Sex ed mainly consisted of watching those episodes and sometimes we would talk about the concepts. Additionally, Veronica Mars episodes and other shows provided some discussion that could reasonably be called sex ed.[4]

So now it’s your turn to weigh in.

  • What sex ed did you have in school? What do you think about it now that you are an adult?
  • How did your parents teach you about sex ed? How did you teach your own kids about it (if you have kids)?
  • What do you think ideal sex education would look like? Should it be a national standard or regional to reflect different values?
  • Are you surprised to find out that sex ed is not required across the board in schools? [5]

Discuss.

[1] Honestly, the term “refusal skills” fills me with quiet rage. As one (probably canceled) comedian put it “I don’t agree with rape, but I didn’t teach my son to be a quitter.” Refusal skills is a setup for classic victim blaming and unhealthy relationship dynamics.

[2] And yes, I did have an Italian friend who lived in a mansion with a kidney shaped swimming pool and said her dad worked in “sanitation management.”

[3] E. Bednar seems to agree since he always says “procreative power” which is alliterative, but also inaccurate unless you’re just doing it during fertile periods which means once you hit menopause, “no soup for you.” Which in retrospect is a really horrible phrase to use regarding abstinence.

[4] I did tell my daughter the story about my mom’s explanation of breast feeding which caused her to shriek with laughter and then ask me “Show me on the doll where she touched you.” Good times.

[5] Or do you have a Twitter account, in which case it’s painfully obvious how poorly informed many people are about human reproduction? Personal favorites include the guys asserting that women can “hold in” their periods, and so it’s totally voluntary. Also, one pro-lifer who claimed that some women are getting 2-3 abortions every month. Or that one senator from the deep south who said that you can’t get pregnant from rape because your body would just not allow that.