I saw half a scary movie the other day. Not really my genre (I have never watched The Exorcist, for example) but it seems there are the traditional horror movies, still popular, and the newer ones with a supernatural angle that’s eerie and disturbing rather than 100% evil and scary. But they all generally have a supernatural angle, whether bad ghosts or evil spirits or humans in league with Satan. If it’s just a bad guy with guns killing people, that’s an action pic or a thriller.

Once in a while there’s a supernatural plot where the spirit is a guardian angel or the helpful spirit of some recently deceased person. Ghost with Patrick Swayze and Demi Moore comes to mind. But for the most part, when there is a supernatural plot, there is evil afoot. It’s supernatural evil. That’s what makes the scary movie scary.

Now let’s talk about Scary Mormonism. Let’s bracket Satan for the moment, and focus instead on that one-third of the host of premortal spirits that sadly never got and won’t get bodies. They are, according to LDS doctrine, very unhappy and they don’t like us embodied humans. Not at all. We are taught they roam the earth, obviously in great numbers, with the intention of taking possession of us, our bodies. It’s not spelled out whether that’s one evil spirit per body or whether a whole flock of them can move in (there’s New Testament precedent for a whole flock). In addition, LDS doctrine teaches that those who don’t follow the directives of LDS leaders are particularly vulnerable to such demonic possession. I know, taken as a whole the last four or five sentences sound a little kooky. But that’s what generations of temple Mormons have been taught.

Now let’s talk about why this is so messed up.

First, accepting for the sake of argument the above-outlined doctrine, if LDS leaders and members really believed all of that, surely there would be both demand for and provision of LDS exorcism ordinances. Certainly the mighty power of the priesthood can cast out any such demons. But exorcism is a big black hole in standard Mormon doctrine (with the exception of a suggestive episode familiar to temple Mormons). If you go to your bishop claiming you or a family member are likely possessed by a demon, I can tell you with 99.99% confidence that (1) the bishop will NOT confirm a diagnosis of demonic possession, and (2) if he wavers on that point, he will equally likely NOT schedule you for an exorcism next Sunday in his office. There are stake clerks and stake auditors, but there is no Stake Exorcist. This is a bit puzzling. It almost suggests that LDS leaders both local and general don’t really believe in demonic possession anymore, despite it being taught to explicitly in LDS doctrine.

Second, think about how supernatural evil is talked about by LDS leaders in General Conference and by the average Mormon over the pulpit on Sunday. It’s all about Satan. His evil influence is deemed to reach anyone and everyone, as sort of a dark parallel to how the influence of the Holy Ghost is described. If, for example, someone planned to attend the temple with their spouse on Saturday, then when leaving discovered not one but two flat tires on their car, they are likely to bear their testimony the next Fast Sunday about how Satan tried to derail their desire to attend the temple (which they righteously overcame by catching a ride with their home teacher or something). Here’s what you will NOT hear in that story: the claim or suggestion that is was an evil spirit (assigned to the anti-temple detail) that did the dirty work. Depending on how you look at it, either Satan’s powers have expanded to preclude the need for any evil spirit associates (partly true, I think), or else LDS belief in specific evil spirits, as opposed to the one Evil Spirit Satan, has declined or simple evaporated. Again, this is rather puzzling in view of the longstanding doctrine of evil spirits and scriptural examples of demonic possession.

Let me sketch two alternatives describing what is going on here. First, it could be that Scary Mormonism is still alive and well, it’s just it was previously described using a host of evil spirits that threatened those who didn’t diligently follow LDS counsel. Whereas now it is described only using the figure of Satan and his vast powers. It’s like the 19th and 20th century version was Scary Mormonism 1 and now we have the sequel, Scary Mormonism 2.

The other alternative is that no one really believes Scary Mormonism anymore. What was once the Plan of Salvation is now termed the Plan of Happiness. No room for scary in the Plan of Happiness. If you bring your troubles to the bishop, he thinks in therapeutic terms, not good-versus-evil possession and exorcism. You are probably aware that Christian belief in Hell has declined dramatically in recent decades. Same phenomenon, different terminology. The term “Hell” does not map well onto the wider variety of LDS postmortal destinations following the Last Judgement, but the apparent fact that Mormon belief in evil spirits roaming the globe seems to have declined dramatically is a good parallel. It would be an exaggeration to say that LDS belief in Satan has likewise declined dramatically — Satan gets plenty of airtime in General Conference and in LDS talks and lessons — but it is possible that such talk is simply habit and tradition. It may be the case that a good portion of even active Latter-day Saints don’t really believe all the talk. It may be the case that many LDS have lost their testimony of Satan. Is that good or bad?

What do you think?

  • Do you (or do most Mormons) believe in hordes of evil spirits roaming the globe, seeking to take possession of unwary or wayward humans?
  • Do you (or most Mormons) believe in guardian angels or good ghosts, the righteous parallel to those evil spirits? LDS doctrine doesn’t specifically affirm the specific idea of “guardian angels,” but does, of course, affirm angels in general.
  • Do you (or most Mormons) believe in Satan?
  • On the topic of Satan, please go read Elaine Pagels’ book The Origin of Satan (1996) if you haven’t already. Thank me later.