It’s time to debunk the Spalding Theory. Some people continue to believe that Joseph Smith plagiarized the Book of Mormon from an earlier work by Solomon Spalding. First I’ll give some background on Solomon Spalding. Check out our conversation…
Here some key facts about Solomon Spalding.
- Born February 20, 1761 in Ashford, CT
- Served in Continental Army during Revolution
- Class of 1785, Dartmouth College (NH)
- Ordained Congregationalist Preacher 1787 in Windham, CT
- 1799 moved to Conneaut, OH and started writing novel which came to be known as “Manuscript Found.”
- Moved to Pittsburgh due to War of 1812.
- Died October 20, 1816 in Amity, Pennsylvania about 40 miles from Pittsburgh
According to the Spalding Theory, Sidney Rigdon allegedly obtained Spalding’s manuscript somehow (it is never explained how and there is nothing tying the two together.) But at any rate, assuming the above is true, Sidney surreptitiously gave the manuscript to Joseph Smith sometime before 1827, despite no record of meeting between any of the three men.
Sidney Rigdon joined Joseph Smith’s church Nov 14, 1830 (7 months after the founding) & always denied any role in writing Book of Mormon. The earliest New York publication linking Rigdon with Book of Mormon authorship was the 1 September 1831 issue of the New York Courier and Enquirer, reprinted in the 29 October 1831 Hillsborough Gazette (Ohio)….’There is no doubt but the ex-parson from Ohio {Rigdon} is the author of the book which was recently printed and published in Palmyra, and passes for the new Bible.’ Let’s examine the 2 biggest promoters of the theory: Doctor Philastus Hurlbut and E.D. Howe.
Doctor Philastus Hurlbut (Feb 3, 1809 – June 16, 1883)
- Former Methodist minister, joined Joseph Smith’s Church of Christ sometime in 1832 or 1833.
- Excommunicated from the Joseph Smith’s church on charges of sexual immorality June 1833
- Collected Affidavits in Palmyra denouncing Joseph Smith
- In 1834, Hurlbut was arrested for allegedly threatening Smith’s life.
- Hurlbut became embroiled in controversy when he threatened to (quoting from page 136 of the Sidney Rigdon biography),
Hurlbut threatened he would “wash his hands” in the prophet’s blood. In January 1834, Smith filed a legal complaint bringing Hurlburt to trial on 1 April. The court found him guilty, fined him $200, and ordered him to keep the peace for 6 months. The notoriety surrounding Hurlbut, compounded by an embarrassing incident when his wife was discovered in bed with Judge Orris Clapp, tarnished his image. He sold his research to Eber D. Howe, editor of the Painesville Telegraph, who held a long-term grudge against Mormonism for converting his wife and daughter.
Eber D. Howe (June 9, 1798 – Nov 10, 1885)
- Founder and editor of the Painesville Telegraph, in 1822
- Published first anti-Mormon book, “Mormonism Unvailed” in 1834
- Strong abolitionist, home used as station for Underground Railroad
Doctor Philastus Hurlbut (or Hurlburt) discovered the manuscript. According to Fawn Brodie on page 144 of her book
No Man Knows My History,
Now to his bitter chagrin he found that the long chase had been vain; for while the romance did concern the ancestors of the Indians, its resemblance to the Book of Mormon ended there. None of the names found in one could be identified in the other; the many battles which each described showed not the slightest similarity with those of the other, and Spaulding’s prose style, which aped the eighteenth-century British sentimental novelists, differed from the style of the Mormon Bible as much as Pamela, or Virtue Rewarded different from the New Testament.
•Fawn Brodie, “No Man Knows My History”, Alfred A. Knopf Books, (1945), page 144
Disappointed in this source, and unable to get any confirming evidence from Joseph’s neighbors in western New York, Hurlbut had to be content with insinuating that Sidney Rigdon, who had once lived in Pittsburgh, was somehow responsible for getting the Spaulding manuscript into Joseph Smith’s hands.
Fawn Brodie, “No Man Knows My History”, Alfred A. Knopf Books, (1945), page 449
In January 1835, Howe sold the paper to his brother for $600, but the newspaper folded later that year. A man by the name of L.L. Rice purchased the assets of the Painesville Telegraph in 1839-40. Many documents came with the purchase, but Rice did not view them at the time. Rice later moved to Honolulu, Hawaii. In the 1880s, James Fairchild, president of Oberlin College in Ohio suggested that Rice look through the documents in search of pre-Civil war slavery information. It was at this point that the Spaulding document was discovered. Rice notes “There is no identity of names, of person, or places; and there is no similarity of style between them.” Rice told Joseph III in 1885:
“I am of the opinion that no one who reads the Manuscript will give credit to the story that Solomon Spaulding was in any wise the author of the Book of Mormon. Finally, I am more than half convinced that this is his only writing of the sort, and that any pretence that Spaulding was in any sense the author of the other, is a sheer fabrication. It is easy for anybody who may have seen this, or heard anything of its contents, to get up the story that they were identical.”
It should be noted that this is the exact document Hurlbut found, as it contains his signature in the back of the manuscript.
Just Read the Manuscript!
There are some surprising similarities between the way the novel says “Manuscript Found” was discovered and Joseph’s account of how he retrieved the golden plates. The introduction states the author (Spalding) found “a flat stone.” Raised it with a lever. One of the interesting things is how many words are misspelled.
- Stone leads to a cave with a “doar.”
- “My mind filled with awful sensations which crowded fast upon me would hardly permit my hands to remove this venerable deposit,”
- It contains 28 “rolls of parchment” written in “eligant hand with Roman Letters & in the Latin Language.”
- p 12 – “waters of the Mississippy”
- p 14 – “inhabited by Europians”
- p 15 – “How be extracated from the insatiable jaws of a watry tomb.” (not only bad spelling, but bad grammar)
- p 17 – “Their King then stept forward”
- p 17 – “performing many odd jesticulations.”
- p 19 – “timber which we hued on two sides”
- p 20 – “healthy bucksom lassies” (note-they were from “Brittian”)
Main Characters
- P 14 – Fabius, Constantine (yes the emperor of Rome)
- p 19 – Lucian, Trojanus
- p 20 – Droll Tom
- p 23 – Deliwanucks (not Lamanites)
- Ohans or Ohians (not Nephites)
- Sciota and Kentuck Indians
The Storm
- “arrived near the coast of Britain when a tremendous storm arose & drove us into the midst of the boundless Ocean. Soon the whole crew became lost & bewildered. They knew not the direction for to the rising Sun or polar Star, for the heavens were covered with clouds; & darkness had spread her sable mantle over the face of the raging deep. Their minds were filled with consternation and despair.
& unanimously agree thatWhat could we do? How be extricated from the insatiable jaws of a watry tomb. Then it was that we felt our absolute dependence on the Almighty & gracious Being who holds the winds & floods in {illegible} hands. From him alone could we expect deliverance.
I won’t read the whole thing. You can check out the video for more of the book, but suffice it to say, it bears only superficial resemblances to the Book of Mormon.
Reactions to the Theory
I’m amazed at the number of people that still embrace the theory, despite the fact that Fawn Brodie, Richard Van Wagoner, and Dan Vogel, who are hardly apologists, think the theory is complete garbage. Even Hurlbut & Howe knew the manuscript they found in 1833 was not the source of the Book of Mormon. Hurlbut’s signature is in “Manuscript Found” which was given to Joseph Smith III! So, they invented a second manuscript that must have been the source because (in their minds), Joseph was clearly too stupid to have written it. And thus the conspiracy theory continues.
Do you know people who believe this theory? Why do you think it is the conspiracy theory that will never die?

It is no surprise that FAIR is the easiest place to get a copy of the Spalding manuscript from. :).
To the question of why the theory just won’t die, I suspect part of the reason is that some accept the Book of Mormon as an amazing work of fiction and Joseph as truly a nearly illiterate farm boy. Dan Vogel is on record as saying that when you read the Book of Mormon stripped of any sort of rose colored glasses, it’s not quite as miraculous a text as assumed, and I tend to agree, having just completed the book again for the umpteenth time.
The author has a tendency to veer off into weird little asides that have little to do with the plot being described as well as creating a timeline that doesn’t seem to work too well when you have fixed points of 600 B.C. and on or about 1 B.C. (Jacob apparently lived and preached for over a 100 years). Further, the text states that the Nephites live the Law of Moses, but darn if you can point out very many passages suggesting that they do. Where’s the Passover or Sukkot? Why doesn’t anyone ever talk about making a sin sacrifice as part of the repentance process (looking at you, Alma the Younger). None of these are new comments, but they reinforce to me that it’s an imperfect book that could have used an editor.
All this is not to say that the Book of Mormon is trash, but I think we (in and out of the Church) make it out to be something it really isn’t.
This was very interesting. I think it’s just as important to debunk the myths as it is to acknowledge the potential issues with the BoM.
We shouldn’t make it out to be something it’s not from either end.
Racist, pseudo-archeological speculation about the Mound Builders (including the notion of a Lost Tribes connection) was popular at the time. Joseph Smith didn’t have to get the idea from Spalding. Ethan Smith’s “View of the Hebrews” is also frequently suspected of influencing the Book of Mormon, directly or indirectly.
I don’t know anyone who believes Spalding wrote the Book of Mormon. The document found also doesn’t match up with the descriptions that were originally given of the work before the manuscript was actually found which could explain why the theory originated in the first place. To me it reinforces Givens ideas of bricolage and shows that many of the overarching ideas in the Book of Mormon were there in Joseph milieu, misspelled words, and all. A better case could be made if so much focus wasn’t placed on spelling and making fun of chapter summaries. A lot is missed by only reading the chapter heads and the BOM doesn’t even have punctuation so pointing out spelling seems like an odd choice as a way to discredit the Spalding theory. I’m sure a typesetter would have fixed many of Spaldings errors also.
A number of years ago in the ex-Mormon community, the Spalding-Rigdon hypothesis was making a comeback. The basis of the claim was that WordPrint studies revealed textual similarity between the Spalding manuscript and the Book of Mormon. Craig Criddle, an engineering professor, was a leading proponent and researcher behind the theory. Chris Johnson gave an excellent presentation about a decade debunking the new theory based on an expanded analysis of verbiage and expression similarities across over 100,000 books to reveal that the Book of Mormon was the most similar the Book of Abraham and D&C. Surprise, surprise. The degree of similarity between the existing Spalding Manuscript, he found, was not significant, compared across over 100,000 books.
Carou, you may not know anyone who believes in the Spalding Theory (and I don’t know anyone IRL), I have gotten lots of comments from believers on my YouTube channel. If you had listened to my presentation, I state several times that the plot is more like Gilligan’s Island than the Book of Mormon. It appears to be a bit satirical I think, and never takes itself too seriously. I do believe Fawn Brodie called it “nearly devoid” of religious material. There is a story about assigning someone to be a spiritual leader, but I agree that the story is not religious in nature.
Brad, I mentioned the Stanford Study in the presentation, as well as the BYU study that thoroughly debunked the Stanford study. It should be noted that Mark Hofmann made a forgery attempting to tie Spalding to Rigdon. I used those sorts of things as evidence why the theory just won’t die (although it still has diehards supporting it.)
I’ll add that for the Spalding Rigdon hypothesis to be true, Rigdon would have had to have had a secret series of contacts with Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery years before the writing of the Book of Mormon when they were between 18 and 22. It boggles the mind why Rigdon would go to such great lengths and cover up a relationship and say that he met them later and to place so much trust in teenagers. Really, really bizarre theory. And yet it was popular among the ex-Mormon crowd for a while, and seems to still have proponents. It really doesn’t make sense.
Hi Rick,
Sorry about my previous comment. It came across as more harsh than I intended. I listened to the presentation while I was working so some parts may not have sunk in. I agree that the manuscript found is far less than the Book of Mormon and is quite difficult to read. I still haven’t been able to make it all the way through. Still there are some amazing similarities between the BOM and manuscript found which make me believe that Joseph had at least heard of the work, been told some version of the story or had at least become aware of the general premise. Clearly though, the two books can not be conflated as having the same author as you make plain in your presentation.