“Principles compatible with the gospel are found in the platforms of all major political parties. While the Church does not endorse political candidates, platforms, or parties, members are urged to be full participants in political, governmental, and community affairs.” (mormon.org)
During one Institute discussion group back in my student days the Institute director told us that an Elders’ Quorum President was a parliamentary candidate for the upcoming general election in another part of the country. Accordingly we discussed whether or not we would vote for a candidate simply because they were a member of the church in good standing, rather than because they belonged to a particular political party. I recall that my view was that I had known quite a few strange Elders’ Quorum Presidents in my time, with whom I did not agree, and that it wasn’t something that would sway my vote. This even though I didn’t then, and don’t now, align myself with a particular party, and prefer if at all possible to select candidates on their individual merits, views, and ability to deviate from the party line.
On Thursday 7 May a General Election is being held in Britain*. There are (to my knowledge) currently two members of the church standing, both for re-election. They are:
First, David Rutley, Member of Parliament from 2010 – 2015, and current parliamentary candidate for the Conservative Party. Him I remember from my singles ward days as a student. He was a nice enough guy back then. Not the alarming type I had in mind during the Institute discussion group anyway. Back when he was elected five years ago, the belief seemed to be that he was the only member of the church in the House of Commons. Perhaps Wikipedia should be updated.
Because there’s also more colourful Craig Whittaker, Member of Parliament from 2010 – 2015, and current parliamentary candidate also for the Conservative Party. Him I know nothing about, other than the information readily available on the internet; born in Britain and raised in Australia before returning to Britain sounds interesting, as do the school rooftop protest and an arrest.
Neither are standing in my local constituency. One or both have participated in the presentation of, or hosted lunches at the Houses of Parliament for the LDS church Family Values Award, and earlier this year were present when David Cameron was presented with his family history by Elders Patrick Kieron and Clifford Herbertson**.
I don’t know how either of them feel about participating in these events as both church members and Members of Parliament. I think I might find it rather awkward. But I did enjoy this blog post dating back to the year following the election of David Rutley in 2010:
“David Rutley, MP for Macclesfield, seemed quite at home in the Thatcher Room among 40+ LDS lawyers, students, and missionaries. Almost. Both during his formal remarks and the Q&A period, he seemed eager to point out that while he was LDS and proud to be so, his job was to represent the people of Macclesfield. When asked what he would say to encourage other Latter-day Saints in the audience considering public life, he professed not necessarily to want to encourage Latter-day Saints to run for office, but all people of “values,” regardless of their faith or creed, or, in fact, any religion at all.
When pressed to help various Church members with events and concerns after the meeting, he again expressed on a personal level that his job, first and foremost, was to his constituency in Macclesfield.
I was impressed. One would expect that among friends and like-minded church members, an LDS MP would relax and demonstrate colors favorable to that crowd. But Mr. Rutley (I suppose I could call him Brother Rutley, as we do in the Church) was dogmatic about his primary concern as a member of Parliament.
…
Yet I would be lying if I said Mr. Rutley did not play to his very sympathetic crowd. He delighted us with stories of being a fresh, naive MP who did not know that the daily prayers in the House of Commons (not televised) are said by members while facing the wall, rather than each other (so that their swords would not clank on the benches when they knelt, clearly); how his door-knocking as a missionary prepared him for door-knocking as an MP candidate; and how his colleagues thoughtfully arranged (without being asked) for him to be able to take his oath of office while placing his hand on both the Book of Mormon and the Bible.” (All-American Mum)
They weren’t the first to participate in national politics in this country, and nor have there been only members of the Conservative Party. I’d also like to mention:
Terry Rooney, Member of Parliament from 1990 – 2010, for the Labour Party. It occurs to me he may well have been the subject of our Institute discussion. His 20 years of service would indicate he was doing something right for his constituents. Sadly, during a boundary realignment his constituency was abolished, and he failed to win a seat in a new constituency in 2010. He also participated in the presentation of the Family Values Award, and was himself a recipient of the award in 2013.
Finally, Brian Adam, Member of the Scottish Parliament (MSP) from 1999 – 2013 for the Scottish National Party. His fellow MSPs spoke well of him following his death from cancer in 2013.
“First Minister Alex Salmond said Mr Adam had been an “exceptional” MSP.
The SNP leader said that as chief whip, Mr Adam had been one of the “crucial people” who sustained the minority SNP government between 2007 and 2011.
“Of course his greatest service was to the people of Aberdeen for a quarter of a century – first as a councillor and then as an MSP,” Mr Salmond said.
“I’m proud to say I’ve known and admired him over that entire period as an outstanding politician, a fine human being and a dear friend…”
Scottish Liberal Democrat leader Willie Rennie described Mr Adam as a “compassionate and decent man” who would be “dearly missed” at the Scottish parliament. “We are all deeply saddened at the passing of Brian Adam, who served the parliament, his party and his community well,” he said. “With a career in science before politics, he was passionate about advancing the cause of science in parliament. Brian was a hard-working and conscientious MSP who had friends across the chamber at Holyrood.”
The Labour MP for Aberdeen South, Dame Anne Begg, also paid tribute to the “hard working” MSP. She said: “If you were to have a political opponent, Brian was the ideal one. He was always polite and charming. Although we were from different political parties, we got on well. Brian always worked hard for his constituents and continued to do so despite his obvious illness.”” (BBC News)
See also: The Life and Legacy of Brian Adam MSP. Wouldn’t it be wonderful if all church members involved in politics left such a legacy?
In local government, Julian Bell is the current leader of the local council in the London Borough of Ealing, and a longstanding member of the Labour Party. He gets a brief mention in this Ensign article from 1998:
“[Hermia Bell’s] husband, Julian, first counselor in the stake presidency, is a political campaign organizer for Britain’s Labour Party. He often rubs shoulders with the famous and influential. That can be exciting, he says, but it’s not nearly so important as what the gospel brings into his life and into his relationships with his wife and children.”
There are no local elections being held in London at the moment.
- Do you know of any other LDS candidates standing for election this time, or serving in local government?
- Are there church members involved in politics in your country or state?
- How well do they juggle church membership and their role as a politican?
- Are you involved in politics at a local or national level? What motivates you?
Discuss.
* There are local elections as well.
** Both of whom I also remember from my singles ward student days, and nice enough guys.
NB. Edited to correct years of service for Terry Rooney.


In Britain, is there a perception that all faithful LDS are going to lean to a certain party? That one is more aligned with church teachings?
(Which of course is a poison in the US, and a reason why some of my kids stopped attending seminary during the first Obama election.)
Naismith, interesting question.
In my experience overt politics are kept out of church. Political parties don’t generally get any air time at all. And that’s really good.
Issues that do arise generally do so during lessons or discussions about self-reliance. There will always be someone who will have something disparaging to say about government welfare programmes, or who will say that when they, or when someone they know lost their job, they didn’t claim unemployment benefits “because the church teaches against that”, or who will bear testimony to the same in a fast and testimony meeting from time to time. Baffles me, because that’s in part what they were paying national insurance contributions for when they were working. So it’s okay to make a claim if you have private insurance to cover that eventuality, but not if it’s a national thing? Kind of weird. A German member in a previous ward thought they were completely mad.
Anyway, the most recent talk we had on the topic of self reliance in a sacrament meeting in my current ward was very, very politically neutral, and that was great. It spoke about taking advantage of educational opportunities, training etc., as well as spiritual self-reliance and so forth. So I hope we’re managing to strip out those attitudes that creep in from US politics mingled with the gospel as it were.
It probably helps that many of the members come from what could be described as a working class background, traditionally supporters of the Labour Party. And it certainly seems to be the better off who can afford to eschew claiming unemployment benefits when losing their job.
As of 8.36am BST 8 May, Craig Whittaker has been re-elected as MP for Calder Valley (http://www.examiner.co.uk/news/local-news/general-election-2015-calder-valley-9040257), and David Rutley almost certainly re-elected as MP for Macclesfield (http://www.macclesfield-express.co.uk/news/local-news/election-2015-live-macclesfield-tatton-9204341).
I lived in Germany during a national election, and I very much appreciated that I heard nary a word uttered about politics, candidates or issues within the halls of the church. Quite refreshing. Also makes sense when you consider Germany has a complicated history of political ideology mixing with religion.
But now I’m back in the States, where many members believe “self-reliance” means stockpiling weapons and ammunition, and hoarding food for the coming apocalypse, while decrying welfare and social programs.
I’m not sure that Craig Whittaker is in fact a member of the Church. I think Mormon Newsroom may be in error here (I stand to be corrected). Whittaker apparently has a high opinion of the Church, but that’s all I know.
Stephen Kerr stood unsuccessfully for the Conservatives in Stirling at yesterday’s election (he is or was an Area Seventy) and Festus Akinbuyose also stood for the Tories in West Ham, a very safe Labour seat. He finished second I believe. I know Sam Rushworth narrowly missed out, a member of the Church standing in Blackpool North for Labour, being defeated in this marginal by the Conservative incumbent. And at least two members were candidates for the anti-European Union UKIP party in yesterday’s General Election. And further to that, one Nathan Gill, a Church member, is ironically a Member of the European Parliament for the said UKIP.
Jonathan, thanks for that additional information. I have been wondering at what point Craig Whittaker may have become a member. It didn’t seem to be in evidence when he married in 2011 (http://www.halifaxcourier.co.uk/news/calderdale/mp-s-marriage-at-westminster-1-3652909). It’s possible he’s a recent convert. His wikipedia page lists him as Mormon, and given he created some recent controversy in the spectator for deleting unfavourable information, I imagine he knows what is in there (http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/steerpike/2015/03/mystery-surrounds-tory-mps-wikipedia-page/).
For those interested to flesh out Jonathan’s comment, and thanks again for the information I hadn’t heard of most of these:
Stephen Kerr (http://www.mormon.org.uk/me/1932 and http://www.kerrforstirling.co.uk/) came in third in Stirling (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/politics/constituencies/S14000057)
Festus Akinbuyose’s candidate page is this one (https://www.conservatives.com/OurTeam/Prospective_Parliamentary_Candidates/Akinbusoye_Festus), and yes, second place (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/politics/constituencies/E14001032)
Sam Rushworth (https://twitter.com/samjrushworth), yes came in second with a respectable 36% of the vote (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/politics/constituencies/E14000572)
Nathan Gill (http://www.nathangillmep.uk/) UKIP MEP.
I was aware that Clive Langley had been going to stand for UKIP in the general election, but he withdrew in March (http://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/Harborough-UKIP-parliamentary-candidate-Clive/story-26172196-detail/story.html).
Jack, that sounds like a very stark difference.
I know too little of UK politics to have an opinion. I assume you Limeys have been taught correct principles and can elect your respective MPs, or run for same yourselves.
I like to think of a certain candidate for PRESIDENT and, hint, his daddy didn’t run a car company…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yeah_Samake
I recall reading about him during the last US elections Douglas.
William (Bill) Walker was the UKIP candidate for Aldershot, and Ethan Wilkinson the UKIP candidate for Cardiff North. Terry Rooney, former Labour MP for a Bradford constituency, and the first member of the church to be elected to the House of Commons, was narrowly
(continued) defeated in the 2010 election. Emeritus GA David M. Baxter fought Ipswich for the Conservatives unsuccessfully back in the 1990s, and the late Brian Adam mentioned above was in the past unsuccessful in fighting a constituency in Aberdeen for the SNP also in the 1990s I believe. There may be others I have missed.
Thanks for that further information Jonathan. I did mention Terry Rooney’s defeat in 2010, and as you said Brian Adam.
Looks like there have been quite a few members putting themselves forward for election over the years. I suppose it might have been David Baxter we were discussing in Institute rather than Terry Rooney, though maybe he was a little later. I don’t recall we were given a name. but it was 1990 or very early 90s we had the discussion.
One of the things that confused me most when I moved to the US was how bizarre the relationship was between lots of Utah’s Mormonism, and politics (then I got into Ezra Taft Benson and… yeah). I found back home that politics rarely played a part in church – I just remember being encouraged to vote and that being it. I still think it’s not overtly mentioned in specific party-names, but FB has blown the cover off many member’s affiliations, so I wonder if that’s changing the undertones of the more vague political discussions occurring in Sunday School.
Good point naomi.
Personally I am rather disappointed by the amount of support there seems to be for UKIP…
Particularly as they have recently been likened to the Tea Party in the US.To me that’s just the politics of hate. Maybe these individuals can make a cogent argument for their cause though.
I work with my kids to help them understand that we need to vote for what our country needs as a nation, rather than narrow it down to our individual interests, and that seems to be an idea they readily come to grips with. As for us adults, seems we’re happy for people to be using food banks rather than pay them a decent wage.
Great , informative post HH. Thankyou.